Get a personal response to your PCN
 
 
Donate
 
 
 
01: Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours.
02: Parked or loading/unloading in a restricted street where waiting and loading/unloading restrictions are in force, parked where there is a yellow line AND yellow markings on the kerb.
04: Parked in a meter bay when penalty time is indicated. You must move your car before the time purchased has expired.
05: Parked after the expiry of paid for time at a pay and display bay. You must move your car before the pay and display ticket has expired.
06: Parked without clearly displaying a valid pay and display ticket. The pay and display ticket must be clearly displayed on the windscreen.
07: Parked with payment made to extend the stay beyond the initial time (Meter Feeding).
08: Parked at an out of order meter during controlled hours. If a meter shows out of order you are not permitted to park there.
09: Parked displaying multiple pay and display tickets where prohibited.
15: Parked in a resident parking space without clearly displaying a valid resident parking permit.
16: Parked in a permit space without displaying a valid permit.
20: Parked in a loading gap marked by a yellow line between two spaces.
21: Parked in a suspended bay/ space or part of a bay/space.
22: Re-parked in the same parking space within 1 hour of leaving.
23: Parked in a parking space or area not designated for that class of vehicle.
24: Not parked correctly within the markings of a bay or space.
25: Parked in a loading bay during restricted hours without loading.
26: Vehicle parked more than 50cm from the kerb, and not then within a designated parking space.
27: Parked across a dropped footway.
30: Parked for longer than permitted.
31: Entering and stopping in a box junction when prohibited
32 (d,t,w): Failing to drive in the direction shown by the arrow on a blue sign
33 (b,c,e,f,g,h,i,k,s,q): Using a route restricted to certain vehicles
34 (see 33): Vehicle seen contravening a bus lane.
37: Failing to comply with a give way to oncoming vehicles sign
40: Parked in a designated disabled persons parking space without clearly displaying a valid disability badge.
45: Parked in a taxi rank.
47: Parked on a restricted bus stop / stand.
48: Stopped in a restricted area outside of a school.
50 (l,r,u): Failing to comply with a sign indicating a prohibited turn
51: Failing to comply with a no entry sign
52 (g,m,s,v,x): Failing to comply with a sign indicating a prohibition on certain types of vehicles
53: Failing to comply with a sign indicating a restriction on vehicles entering a pedestrian zone
55: A commercial vehicle parked in a restricted street, in contravention of the over night waiting van.
62: Parked with one or more wheels on any part of an urban road other than the carriageway (footpath parking).
82: Parked after expiry of time paid for in a pay and display car park.
83: Parked in a pay and display car park, without clearly displaying a valid pay and display ticket.
99: Stopped on a pedestrian crossing and/or area marked by zigzags.
no code currently allocated: Failing to stop at a stop line
 

The M11 speed camera that has resulted in a near doubling of accidents

 

What may well be one of the most profitable speed cameras in the country is actually causing accidents and injuries and yet Essex Police are refusing to remove it. 

The Camera was installed in May 2001 on a busy stretch of the M11 between junctions 4 and 5 of the southbound carriageway. The speed limit reduces from 70mph to 50mph without prior warning, the carriageway narrows from 3 to 2 lanes and just beyond is a speed camera. In February 2008 we  witnessed the aftermath of a 3 car pile up immediately in front of the camera. It was obvious that it was the camera that caused the accident because cars were having to reduce speed and merge and then of course some motorists slamm on their brakes when they pass the camera. So we asked the department of transport for the accident and casualty statistics. The camera was installed in May 2001. In the first 5 months of 2001 (pre speed camera) there was one slight accident with 1 slight casualty.

In the second half of 2001 (post camera installation) there was one serious accident, 4 slight accidents, 1 serious casualty and 10 slight casualties. Now you don't need a degree in traffic management to see that the camera should have been removed immediately.

In the 5½ years prior to its installation there were a total of 13 accidents and 14 casualties.

In the 5½ years post installation there were 18 accidents and 26 casualties!

At the same time we suspect millions of pounds has been made.  How much we don't know because after 3 requests to Essex police and a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office, they are refusing to disclose the number of fixed penalty notices issued due to "operational reasons".

So, recently we wrote to Essex police and our local MP. We pointed out that this camera is causing accidents and injuries and provided them with the statistics which we obtained from the Department of Transport. We have now received back replies to our letters.

Essex police say "On the question of the statistics provided to you by the HA, on their own they are of little use, you may recall I mentioned in my previous letter it is also important to understand other factors around any information, for example the causation factors associated with any incidents that has not been shown, so it is difficult to fully analyse the information and make any firm conclusions"  

It would seem that the police can't see that the causation factor is actually the camera!  They go on to say that "finally I would add that the partnership reviews all its enforced sites annually and is satisfied that this and other sites should remain".  We have asked for a copy of the review but won't hold our breath.

Jim Fitzpatrick from the Department for transport says "In the case of the M11, the casualty data does not show a pattern of incidents which would be consistent with the camera itself being a factor".  

We think It is worrying how someone like this can get to such a high position in our government.  

The undisputed fact is that no lives have been saved by this camera and many more accidents have occurred and people been injured as a result of it. The partnership that runs the camera is ironically called "The Essex casualty reduction partnership!!!"

How do they all get away with it?   

Luckilly the Sun have exposed what is going on. http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2093917.ece

In order to continue to fund our work and websites we need your donations. If you find information on our website that assists you in having a penalty charge notice (parking ticket) cancelled or simply don’t agree with what is happening and want to support us we would appreciate a small donation (via out PayPay donations page). 

Thank you!